[CentOS-devel] Documentation SIG
Zachary Oglesby
zach at oglesby.coFri Jan 17 13:43:46 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Documentation SIG
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Documentation SIG
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 01/10/2014 05:22 PM, Philip Mather wrote: >> Has there been any interest or progress in the suggested Documentation SIG? >> > > Is this proposal to 'write more docs' or > > Is it more of a religious 'everyone should write more docs, we will create resources, make it easier' etc ? > > step1, lets define the problem :) > > - K Having worked on Fedora Docs for many years I would like to make a suggestion that the same model is followed, just in reverse. Many Red Hat docs start as Fedora Documentation and are tweaked to fit RH products. CentOS can use the RH docs as a base and remove the unneeded content. While it will not provide everything CentOS needs for documentation a lot of good content has already been written as in licensed so that it can be reused (CC BY-SA 3.0). I may be making an incorrect assumption, but it is worth mentioning. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140117/e435b8be/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Documentation SIG
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Documentation SIG
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list