On 01/09/2014 06:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. My main "concern" is that bugs.c.o. has > not been receiving much attention by the community as well as by the > admin team. It can use more assistance / man power and that should > help speed up identifying and resolving bugs, or discarding non-bugs > and redirect users to support venues. thats an important thing - quite a few of those are just people asking for help or 'hey i installed this thing, now what'; so i mostly defer to the QA folks to triage > There are those that definitely need actions from the admin side. I'm > hoping, with the latest arrangement, that the devteam would be able to > spend more time for the stuff hanging in bugs.c.o. Then, anything that > is still left unresolved > 1 year might have to be "given up" and > closed as such. The idea of 'devteam' is going to erode a bit moving forward, which is good - because the throwback should be a much larger group of people able to execute / change / propose-change. How about we recap in 6 months to see if that has happened ? - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc