On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb at redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/15/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > > I don't think that's a fair claim to PaaS because PaaS can exist > completely > > independently of IaaS but can at points have integration. I run OpenShift > > Origin at home on bare metal on spare hardware that I don't care to incur > > the overhead of virt or IaaS. Because of this I don't like to classify > PaaS > > as an IaaS application. > > Is this a typical production use, though? I ask seriously - I don't know > how folks are deploying OpenShift and whether it requires IaaS to scale > well. > I don't really know if you'd call it "typical" but I know of customers currently running OpenShift Enterprise on bare metal today. Honestly the main reason I shy away from "typical" is because I don't personally have stats (I suppose I could try to find them) of how different OpenShift Origin and Enterprise users are deploying currently to define what is and isn't typical. -AdamM > -- > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst > jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140115/8e44e868/attachment-0007.html>