On 01/17/2014 01:43 PM, Zachary Oglesby wrote: >> On 01/10/2014 05:22 PM, Philip Mather wrote: >>>/ Has there been any interest or progress in the suggested Documentation SIG? > />>/ > /> >> Is this proposal to 'write more docs' or >> >> Is it more of a religious 'everyone should write more docs, we will > create resources, make it easier' etc ? >> >> step1, lets define the problem :) >> >> - K > > Having worked on Fedora Docs for many years I would like to make a suggestion that the same model is followed, just in reverse. Many Red Hat docs start as Fedora Documentation and are tweaked to fit RH products. CentOS can use the RH docs as a base and remove the unneeded content. While it will not provide everything CentOS needs for documentation a lot of good content has already been written as in licensed so that it can be reused (CC BY-SA 3.0). > > I may be making an incorrect assumption, but it is worth mentioning. > thats a great suggestion - It would be absolutely great to see some people adapt the RHEL-6 ( and 7 ? ) docs to CentOS-6/7, and as you mentioned, its a case of using rm -rf ( carefully ) in the right places. What do we need to get started ? - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc