On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Sam Kottler <s at shk.io> wrote: > > > > On 01/22/2014 05:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > On 01/22/2014 12:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> On 01/16/2014 04:11 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: > >>> For OpenStack we need 0.7.x. It'll be great if we could have it in EPEL. > >>> > >> > >> reporting from a conversation on irc earlier today, Sam is going to push > >> getting cloud-init 0.7.x into EPEL-6 within a few days time. > >> > >> that then means we dont need to own cloud-init in CentOS-Extras/ for > >> now, and images we ship will retain an upgrade path for the code/content > >> inside that. > >> > >> I think its worth waiting for the newer cloud-init to arrive in epel. > > > > there is a possibility that we can get 0.7.5 of cloud-init, which will > > help resolve a bunch of issues with opennebula and cloudstack issues as > > well. > > 0.7.5 is not released upstream yet AFAICT despite their documentation > site and other stuff being updated. Can anyone confirm this? Confirmed. 0.7.5 isn't out yet. 0.7.4 isn't good enough? ...Juerg > The version > that's in ubuntu seems to be built straight from bzr. I've just > committed a pretty large changeset that bumps to 0.7.4; thanks to Lars > Kellogg-Stedman and Steve Hardy for their assistance. There are still > some dependency issues which I'm working on fixing now, but those should > hopefully be taken care of soon. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140122/520f82b0/attachment-0007.html>