[CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 2 July 2014 03:38, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:

> On 07/02/2014 10:31 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> > On 02/07/14 09:23, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 06/25/2014 04:50 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >>> Note: this tree now has a centos-release that implements the scope of
> >>> change we were talking about in the numbering thread. I went through
> >>> quite a few permutations and what we have here seems like the best
> >>> middle ground to be on. I am also going to try and circle back to some
> >>> of the RH folks to make sure they are ok with how we message around
> >>> where the CentOS Linux release is built from.
> >>
> >> Still looking for feedback here - were pretty much at release grade at
> >> this point and the number conversation needs to close off before we can
> >> push to prod.
> >>
> >> The tree's from the last few days have still implemented the 7.1406
> >> scheme with almost no feedback, but for us to move forward we need a +1
> >> vote from people here.
> >>
> >
> > -1
> >
> >> the other scheme that is also on the options is the 7-0-1406 and
> >> 7-0-core-1406
> >>
> >
> > I assume you mean 7.0-1406 and 7.0-core-1406 here?
>
> no, we've never actually done a .anything relese, refer back to the
> centos-release rpms from the last 10 odd years :)
>
> eg: centos-6 is at the moment : 6-5.11.2
>
>
Ohhh. you know if I had realized that was what you were talking about this
whole time :).

7-core-1406

[though I would prefer 201406]

and your bikeshed needs to be pale yellow.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140702/b86aac72/attachment.html>