[CentOS-devel] Overlap between EPEL and CentOS ( non upstream pkgs )

[Karsten Wade]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/09/2014 07:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:14:27PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> I am hoping we can find a way to communicate this and sync with
>> the epel folks in a manner that it does not cause too much
>> issues. priorities will help i guess, but it will cause issues
>> when people want to consume one and not the other ( either way ),
>> specially when its down to libs
> 
> It's getting a bit late, but there is a session on the future of
> EPEL at Flock in Prague next month: http://sched.co/SbXE17 -- it'd
> be great to have interested CentOS people there.

As it happens, we've got a bunch of the core team planning to attend
specifically to work on future-proofing discussions with Fedora.

Is anyone else planning on going?

- -- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade        .^\          CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org    \  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'             gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlO9b9UACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEGlXwCg0uPCtrJ12gR0CyVSvU1hScnx
SYsAn0o+rwk6/dEfQRKT9W2/PBAHOFNL
=1U4s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----