On 07/02/2014 11:31 AM, Tim Bell wrote: >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- >> >bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh >> >Sent: 02 July 2014 10:24 >> >To:centos-devel at centos.org >> >Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4 >> > > .... >> > >> >The tree's from the last few days have still implemented the 7.1406 scheme with >> >almost no feedback, but for us to move forward we need a +1 vote from people >> >here. >> > >> >the other scheme that is also on the options is the 7-0-1406 and >> >7-0-core-1406 >> > > Assuming STV, my preference would be > > 1. 7-0-core-1406 > 2. 7-0-1406 I have the same preferences as the original poster ("(option 1 makes it clear what RHEL release the build is derived from, with consistent naming for SIGs to follow and a date stamp to show the build age and cover rebuilds for cloud images) ") about these two. Even if I am still not convinced at all that we need to make this change. > 3. 7.1406 definite -1 . We lose the pairing with the corresponding RHEL minor release