On 07/02/2014 10:49 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 07/02/2014 11:31 AM, Tim Bell wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- >>>> bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh >>>> Sent: 02 July 2014 10:24 >>>> To:centos-devel at centos.org >>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4 >>>> >> .... >>>> >>>> The tree's from the last few days have still implemented the 7.1406 scheme with >>>> almost no feedback, but for us to move forward we need a +1 vote from people >>>> here. >>>> >>>> the other scheme that is also on the options is the 7-0-1406 and >>>> 7-0-core-1406 >>>> >> Assuming STV, my preference would be >> >> 1. 7-0-core-1406 >> 2. 7-0-1406 > I have the same preferences as the original poster ("(option 1 makes it > clear what RHEL release the build is derived from, with consistent > naming for SIGs to follow and a date stamp to show the build age and > cover rebuilds for cloud images) ") about these two. Even if I am still > not convinced at all that we need to make this change. +1 > >> 3. 7.1406 > definite -1 . We lose the pairing with the corresponding RHEL minor release Also -1 for 3rd option. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant