On 07/02/2014 05:27 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Trevor Hemsley > <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com> wrote: >> On 02/07/14 09:49, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>> I have the same preferences as the original poster ("(option 1 makes it >>> clear what RHEL release the build is derived from, with consistent >>> naming for SIGs to follow and a date stamp to show the build age and >>> cover rebuilds for cloud images) ") about these two. Even if I am still >>> not convinced at all that we need to make this change. >> +1 on all that from here too > +1 from me. > > FWIW, +1 here too. 7-0-core-1406 is clear, even if a bit verbose.