On 2 iulie 2014 18:02:55 EEST, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >On 07/02/2014 03:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Morten Stevens >> <mstevens at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think what people want is to keep it closely tied to the >upstream >>>>> identification. >>>> >>>> yes, which is what this achieves. >>> >>> No, it doesn't. Close to upstream means 7.0 and not 7-0-core-1406. >>> >>> CentOS 7.0 will reflect RHEL 7.0 codebase / code age. Based on >upstream. >>> >>> CentOS 7-0-core-1406 will confuse many people. >>> >> >> The confusion could be solved by a little table on the CentOS web >site >> showing the matching identifiers. Then again, if it is a 1:1 >> correspondence, why change it at all? Just make the table showing >the >> dates.... Or look at the timestamp on the file the way you usually >> find dates when things were done. >> > >this is a great idea, I will write up something that expands on the >numbering and also use that as something to point people working with >variants and alternative media at. > >was going to do something for the release announcement, but having it >more visible on the website and often linked ( maybe a readme in >centos-release ? ) might be a great ( and easy ) win. > If the content is small enough, entry #1 in CentOS 7 FAQ. If not, separate wiki page also linked from FAQ #1 >- KB