On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > >> >> The difference is, in git you can roll back to whatever version you >> want, all in one spot, see the specs and sources already exploded, edit >> them if required, etc. >> >> We always also need to look at the compilation of those binaries to >> match up the isos, etc. >> > I think that his question was more like "how do we - as end consumers > wishing to look "straight at the source" - know that a specific > package-version-release came as update for 7.0 or was released as part > of 7.1 ?". Am I right, Les ? > No, I wasn't thinking of needing to check for myself - just wanted to know that someone already had. But, having tried to assemble systems with back-rev components to duplicate and debug issues I'm wondering if that will be better/worse/same? It's not particularly easy now, especially once you cross minor rev releases. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com