Cool, thanks for the thought. Nico Kadel-Garcia Email: nkadel at gmail.com Sent from iPhone > On Jul 7, 2014, at 21:17, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> On 07/07/2014 08:10 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Thanks for all the work! I've some personal experience of shifting to major new releases, and the adventures involved in re-engineering the build environments for compatibity. You've my sympathy. >> >> Would it make sense to have a "yum-conf-epel-release-beta", to be obsoleted by an upcoming "yum-conf-epel-release"? It's an important repo for "mock" and a number of Perl modules, at least for me. I'd be happy to submit a spec file in a day or two, if it would help. > > > I toyed with that idea, but ultimately in conversation the EPEL folks > don't think the wait will be overly long for non-beta status. I don't > think it'll be necessary. > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel