On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > On 07/09/2014 12:19 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Mustafa Muhammad >> <mustafaa.alhamdaani at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I just did a minimal el6 install and yum-presto is not included there >>>> either. >>>> >>> You are right, my bad, not included by default. >>> But again, if there is no reason other than the size for not including >>> it, please consider adding it to the default minimal set (for the >>> bandwidth reasons). >> I think it might have been included in some versions of the minimal >> release (maybe 6.3 or so?). I have yum-presto on one system and 'yum >> info' says it came from: >> >From repo : anaconda-CentOS-201207061011.x86_64 >> and I think that was a minimal iso, >> but it hasn't been on other versions. > It was included until 6.3 but got removed once the concept of the > minimal ISO was changed from " a minimum of packages needed to have a > functional system " to "a set of installed packages almost identical to > the one installed when choosing the group named "Minimal" from the full > DVD image." See > http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSMinimalCD6.4 vs > http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSMinimalCD6.3 > > And I have to be honest and declare that I have no idea why we[*] > included presto in the first iterations of the disk. It was an error, it > should not have been there. > > manuel > > [*] I was part of the team who created the manifest for the minimal image. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel I am assuming it is important because of the large updates of some packages, in this case the kernel, but you made a point with the "minimal" concept. Thank you all, and again, thanks for this fast release.