-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2014 07:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:14:27PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> I am hoping we can find a way to communicate this and sync with >> the epel folks in a manner that it does not cause too much >> issues. priorities will help i guess, but it will cause issues >> when people want to consume one and not the other ( either way ), >> specially when its down to libs > > It's getting a bit late, but there is a session on the future of > EPEL at Flock in Prague next month: http://sched.co/SbXE17 -- it'd > be great to have interested CentOS people there. As it happens, we've got a bunch of the core team planning to attend specifically to work on future-proofing discussions with Fedora. Is anyone else planning on going? - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO9b9UACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEGlXwCg0uPCtrJ12gR0CyVSvU1hScnx SYsAn0o+rwk6/dEfQRKT9W2/PBAHOFNL =1U4s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----