On 13/07/14 21:01, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 07/13/2014 01:24 AM, Trevor Hemsley wrote: >> On 28/06/14 11:44, Anssi Johansson wrote: >>> Please note that some install options will automatically pull in some >>> extra packages. For example, installing on an encrypted filesystem will >>> pull in some packages, and installing on software RAID will pull in some >>> another set of packages. Here's a list of packages that I think are one >>> way or another affected by this (and their dependencies): >>> >>> chrony >>> cryptsetup >>> cryptsetup-libs >>> device-mapper-event >>> device-mapper-event-libs >>> device-mapper-persistent-data >>> dosfstools >>> efibootmgr >>> grub2 >>> grub2-efi >>> grubby >>> libreport-filesystem >>> lvm2 >>> lvm2-libs >>> mdadm >>> mokutil >>> shim >>> shim-unsigned >>> >>> I would suggest making sure these packages get included, otherwise some >>> functionality of the installer may break. >>> >>> anaconda also mentions realmd. I suppose it would get installed if >>> anaconda needs to access an Active Directory server during installation. >>> That package depends on PackageKit-glib, libarchive, oddjob, >>> oddjob-mkhomedir and psmisc. I don't have an AD server here at home, but >>> I suppose it'd work like >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_realmd_join_kickstart >> >> I did a minimal install under VBox this evening then ran yum install for >> the 18 packages listed above. 8 of those were already installed so this >> added 10 to the mix. I didn't include the ones listed as Active >> Directory. I then ran this in the Packages dir of the DVD1 with just the >> rpm names in my txt file: >> >> $ for f in $(cat /tmp/rpmnames.txt); do ls -la $f-[0-9]*; done > >> /tmp/rpmnls.txt >> $ awk '{ n += $5 } END { print n }' /tmp/rpmnls.txt >> 210154444 >> >> I've now attached that list to my mail in the format discussed on IRC. >> If I'm right about 210MB then I don't think space on a CD will be too >> much of a problem but let's wait and see what it turns out like once >> it's built ;-) >> > > We pushed and did some initial testing around a minimal build last night > on irc. the builds were pushed to > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64 > > It does not have the anaconda changes we typically do with the minimal > install, but otherwise it should be a complete build at 565MB in size. > > please test it, its essential that we get as wide a testing base and > options / variations as possible. > Well, it crashes for me .. I'll compare the packages list you have used, as it seems less than the normal @core minimal set, which was supposed to be the target (well, in fact *more* packages than just @core, as some deps are needed when using luks/mdadm/btrfs/mdadm, and so on ...) I'll come back with a list and also reading the whole thread about packages people were mentioning -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab