-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14.07.2014 21:27, Neil Wilson wrote: > Importantly it is *safer*, not more *secure*. Okay, I can agree with this, but I'm under the impression most online tutorials mix this up or create false security by subliminal indicating that this would be more secure. Thanks for your differentiation! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJTxXBVAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqllcMMAIcUgoVtC0aIEj+VaqB1prXm J7r7j6NtQ7mVmxnvu1Qe6xplbhEVO5pGCDrOPc9GW244bgOhEmx9pVCCnrd5cBmj yZM62ndq6OYZHvW4Pe7dMFsrdHRm7WNKOoEyOmupQPOnNFpQWwwUtast+97yMt2Q 3mQOCTtp6UEo4X2eNPWQRtqDjUPFSu996yLfdfgA0TrNtUX/JQvVeXSUbrWzZOlg oDEYYqucOFgwmUgaIebbGqpo0slsnaAlj/Xob5/8TaiBHshfzs9144BQffHMouQw Ecte4HztamWCm9Ik2lDg2KoEfxTlrBBoTTja9KAbmpUlbco8f3XU6d8JDP5+UgmB 4ZoJ9m4xVFzY5cml8R379XPu7YRZzcncNuizYpz3GDLGZhAWC6cqyU0JVgGbedRt IOKRr9QeIztLevauFdJnQiIwPRp30E6lg4YGiSHz2BxyDfWi2yoNSaMW3A1ycIU/ rqHXBRuSz8v5Jy/5YJFj8gUxvVUqjKCyY/4j+vdIJw== =j5Hm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----