[CentOS-devel] Branding hunt

[Jim Perrin]

On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> 3) To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code
> represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be
> a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux'
> 
> Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for
> branding issues :
> a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its
> Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string


With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL
as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or
leave it as-is?

</devil's advocate>

-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77