[CentOS-devel] Branding hunt

[Karanbir Singh]

On 06/03/2014 12:47 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> 
>> 3) To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code
>> represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be
>> a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise
>> Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux'
>>
>> Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for
>> branding issues :
>> a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its
>> Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string
> 
> 
> With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL
> as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or
> leave it as-is?

If we can, we could/should add CentOS distros there - and set suiteable
defaults to match. After all, the install route for CentOS Linux is
quite different from RHEL ( even the ISO media! ).


-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc