[CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Not all git.c.o repos have SOURCES dir

Pat Riehecky riehecky at fnal.gov
Wed Jun 11 15:42:33 UTC 2014


My general preferences are for more aggressive and detailed checks.

For example, in the dist tag script there are extra checks that are, 
strictly speaking, unnecessary (lines 64-66).

Since shell scripts are difficult to generate unit tests, I tend towards 
extra stuff to hopefully make sure my behaviour is as expected.

Mike's quick patch for my typos shows my humanity and why my code 
_always_ needs extra error checking.  :)

my $0.02, more sanity checks == better

Pat


On 06/11/2014 10:32 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi Pat,
>
> Mike and I were talking about this - it might be enough to just check
> for the metadata file and the .git, you agree ?
>
>
> On 06/11/2014 04:21 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky at fnal.gov>
>>
>> I've found a few repos without a SOURCES directory.
>>
>> For example, kpatch source cannot be fetched without this patch.
>>
>> Pat Riehecky (1):
>>    Fixed so it works on kpatch golang-*
>>
>>   get_sources.sh |    3 ++-
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/




More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list