[CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Starting talks about licenses for the centos-git-common files

[Mike McLean]

Sorry for not replying sooner. I'm find with any reasonable OSI license.
The board is needs to decide if we're going to declare a default license
for such scripts.


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Pat Riehecky <riehecky at fnal.gov> wrote:

> On 06/17/2014 05:58 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > On 06/17/2014 06:24 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> >> From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky at fnal.gov>
> >>
> >> I realized the scripts I've been sending in weren't licensed.
> >>
> >> So, I've added one to show_possible_srpms.sh.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we should talk about getting the rest of the tools
> >> under an open source license.
> >>
> >> Pat Riehecky (1):
> >>    Realized this was missing a license, added
> >>
> > any specific reason to go with GPLv3 ?
> >
> >
> Not really, just seemed like a workable choice for a pile of scripts.
>
> Pat
>
> --
> Pat Riehecky
>
> Scientific Linux developer
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140619/dd638376/attachment.html>