[CentOS-devel] missing packages from buildlogs repo
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.org
Thu Jun 26 13:52:26 UTC 2014
On 06/26/2014 07:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you publish somewhere those packages, which are built for multilib
> purposes but are not in the RHEL packagelist? I'd like to use them for
> bootstrapping the EL7 i686 builds and see, what happens. I don't like
> to use Fedora 19 packages for bootstrapping, since I'd have to do the
> compilation twice.
>
> I'd like to help building the i686 packages, where should I start?
>
Yes, they are all in c7.00.0[2,3,4] and c7-updates:
http://buildlogs.centos.org/
You could likely use lftp mirror command to get those, though it will
take a while.
Once CentOS-7 GA is out the door, we will likely start concentrating on
this ... it should be something that is a priority soon after.
But, I would expect both EL 5.11 and EL 6.6 fairly soon as well, so we
will have to see what happens.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Feladó: *"Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org>
> *Címzett: *centos-devel at centos.org
> *Elküldött üzenetek: *Csütörtök, 2014. Június 26. 14:05:22
> *Tárgy: *Re: [CentOS-devel] missing packages from buildlogs repo
>
> On 06/26/2014 06:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I
> tried to
> > use the i686 packages here:
> > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/
> >
> > The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing.
> (that's
> > ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support)
> >
> > The interesting part is that there is the source package *cracklib*,
> > which produces the following packages:
> > cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python.
> >
> > Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the
> other two
> > packages are missing. How can it be?
> > Did I miss some information about populating the repo?
>
> The multilib packages contained in CentOS-7 x86_64 distro are the same
> as those contained in the upstream EL7 version, as we purposely match
> the filelists.
>
> As KB stated, all the i686 packages we needed to do the build are
> in the
> c7.00.0? (or c7-updates) directories. But even those are not
> enough for
> a full tree ... just want we needed to get all the i686 for multilib.
>
> We are planning on building a full i686 ARCH, as I have said before.
> But the x86_64 manifest will not have all the i686 packages, only the
> multilib ones.
>
> So eventually, all the i686 RPMs will be available when we actually
> build to complete an i686 tree.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140626/762932c6/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list