[CentOS-devel] Branding hunt

On 06/03/2014 02:47 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> 3) To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code
>> represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be
>> a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise
>> Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux'
>>
>> Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for
>> branding issues :
>> a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its
>> Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string
>
> With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL
> as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or
> leave it as-is?
>
> </devil's advocate>
it depends on how much fate you have in the users. I've seen someone 
asking once in #centos what option to use for virt-install since he only 
had "rhel", "fedora" .....