[CentOS-devel] RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
Christoph Galuschka
tigalch at tigalch.orgTue Jun 17 16:48:03 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 17.06.2014 18:13, schrieb Jeff Sheltren: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org > <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote: > > hi, > > So we now have RHEL media, RHEL optionals and RHEL Extras. Optionals and > media seems to tie in as before, however Extras has its own policy + > lifeterm etc. > > Thoughts on what we might do with those rpms ? I'd have though that > putting them in CentOS-Extras would line up nicely. Content that is > available out of the blocks to anyone with a CentOS install, but not > themselves included in the distro. > > thoughts ? > > > I like that approach. If these packages actually have different > lifetime expectancies, may change versions, etc. I think putting them in > Base could be problematic. CentOS-Extras seems like a good compromise. > Is there any reason these might need to be separated from what was > historically in CentOS-Extras? > > -Jeff +1 -- Christoph Galuschka CentOS-QA member | IRC: tigalch
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list