[CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Starting talks about licenses for the centos-git-common files
Pat Riehecky
riehecky at fnal.govTue Jun 17 17:29:07 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Realized this was missing a license, added
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Starting talks about licenses for the centos-git-common files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/17/2014 12:24 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky at fnal.gov> > > I realized the scripts I've been sending in weren't licensed. > > So, I've added one to show_possible_srpms.sh. > > Perhaps we should talk about getting the rest of the tools > under an open source license. > > Pat Riehecky (1): > Realized this was missing a license, added > > show_possible_srpms.sh | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > Mike, what are your thoughts on making return_disttag.sh GPLv3? Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Realized this was missing a license, added
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] [PATCH] Starting talks about licenses for the centos-git-common files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list