[CentOS-devel] Release file versioning, sunk costs and community involvement

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, R P Herrold wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I have stayed still on the topic of release naming, as I had
> little new to offer.  TL;DR: my opinion is that Smooge
> probably has it right suggesting most recently a NEVR of:
> 	Name:	centos-release
> 	Epoch:	nil
> 	Version: 7.0_201407
> 	Release: 0.201407

+1

If we have to change things, I think this is a better solution.

Regards,

-- 
Tom			me at tdiehl.org		Spamtrap address	 		me123 at tdiehl.org