[CentOS-devel] EL 7 Extras Test BUild

Why not include Fail2Ban in the extras too. It is a nice utility to have.

john plemons


On 6/26/2014 10:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 06:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> EL7 Extras contain docker and the things to make it work, including
>> several golang-* RPMs.
>>
>> It seems that the golang addon packages
>> (golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.4.git9d69345.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-github-godbus-dbus-0-0.1.gitcb98efb.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-github-gorilla-context-0-0.22.git708054d.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-github-gorilla-mux-0-0.11.gite718e93.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.19.git98c7b80.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-github-syndtr-gocapability-0-0.5.git3454319.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-googlecode-net-0-0.12.hg84a4013f96e0.el7.src.rpm,
>> golang-googlecode-sqlite-0-0.9.hg74691fb6f837.el7.src.rpm) were built
>> before the final golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm that is in git.centos.org.
>>
>> We have seen in the past where Red Hat uses interim staged packages that
>> are older (and not published) in their build systems for development,
>> and that the released SRPMs build on those older staged packages but not
>> the released ones.  As I said, we have seen this in the past and it was
>> one of the main reasons that we could not get all of CentOS-6.0 to build
>> properly before.
>>
>> So, how this is relevant now is that several of those addon golang
>> packages (and docker) do not build with the RPMs provided by building
>> golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm.  After talking with the golang maintainer
>> and some people who worked on the golang and docker packages via email,
>> while I could not look inside the build trees (we don't have access to
>> any of that for RHEL products), I did get conformation that the packages
>> in EL7 extras were built on older versions of golang that 1.2.1-3 and
>> that golang-1.2.1-3 is in the middle of a process to transition things
>> to a new set of packages instead of most things directly in the one main
>> RPM.
>>
>> I was also pointed to golang.el7 rpms here as potential versions that
>> would work:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16224
>>
>> The greatest specific version of golang required to build the packages
>> of EL7 Extras (docker-0.11.1-19.el7.src.rpm) is golang >= 1.2-7 (see the
>> spec file for the golang BuildRequires):
>>
>> https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!docker.git/b28b51e15aa6779281060b1e61368d948730d0f4/SPECS!docker.spec
>>
>> So, looking for golang-1.2-7.el7 put me here:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=499629
>>
>> I downloaded that SRPM (golang-1.2-7.el7.src.rpm) and built it into
>> c7-extras instead of the 1.2.1-3 version and then rebuilt all the other
>> golang-* SRPMs from git.centos.org into c7-extras as well.  They all
>> built OK against golang 1.2-7.  I then built all the other things that
>> are in EL7 Extras into c7-extras and the final result is here:
>>
>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/
>>
>> Here is a bug filed on this issue for reference:
>>
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7252
>>
>> So, the short summary is, please test the c7-extras in the buildlogs
>> repo ... it has the same version of packages built from git.centos.org
>> except for golang, where I had to get version 1.2-7 from EPEL.  All the
>> SRPMs, buildlogs, mock configs, etc used are available for review from
>> the buildlogs.centos.org link above.
>>
>> Lets get this tested and it is certainly considered a test build.
>> Hopefully newer versions of everything will be out soon so we can build
>> / use the RHEL version of golang and we are likely not to officially
>> release these packages until then, although if these packages work for
>> you feel free to use them.
> Now that we have this docker version built, we know that it has an issue
> with looking for a Red Hat entitlement.  We are currently working on
> taking that out so it can run docker images on CentOS without that.
> Will post here when that is working.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140626/2854dc26/attachment-0003.html>