On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 05/30/2014 06:02 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> As we gear up for the upcoming CentOS 7 release, we're tracking a few >> things for the CentOSPlus kernel as well. One of the proposals (via >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 ) is that we change the current >> name of the centosplus kernel to be a bit more consistent with other >> kernel names. The proposed new name would look like 'kernel-plus' or >> 'kernel-centosplus'. This is in keeping with other kernel names such as >> 'kernel-ml', 'kernel-xen', 'kernel-lt' etc. And allows for >> /etc/sysconfig/kernel to be used to set the DEFAULTKERNEL as desired. >> >> This change would only be for CentOS 7. >> >> Thoughts, comments, questions, flames? >> >> Please speak up with support for or against this change. > > kernel-plus gets my vote, > > it then also makes room in the same namespace for things like kernel-lts > or kernel-xen or kernel-cloud and friends. Not that I am saying were > going to do any of these, but just in case. Now that RHEL 7 is out, it is time to decide on the naming. I'm accustomed to saying "cplus kernel". So, that will be kernel-cplus. Then anyone wishing to do further modifications can call it kernel-c++. ;-) However, kernel-plus is also fine with me. Since this is KB's choice, if no one is against it, I suppose this is going to be the "final answer". Akemi