On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > 3) To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code > represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be > a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise > Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux' > > Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for > branding issues : > a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its > Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or leave it as-is? </devil's advocate> -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77