On 06/02/2014 06:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > There are three things that we are trying to achieve in the branding > hunt. In priority order these are : > > 1) To remove Red Hat TM's so as to meet their requirements and guidelines > > 2) To establish the CentOS Branding and identity > > 3) To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code > represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be > a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise > Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux' > > Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for > branding issues : > a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its > Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string > > b) Even if someone has reported a component as checked, please check it > again - more +1's to a patch, or to a whitelist request, or to a > blacklist request help increase confidence in the overall end result. > > c) please also install and check in the GUI, sometimes applications > About box's will have the Red Hat shadowman logos that we need to > usually replace. > > d) When in doubt, feel free to reach out > > Getting in touch : During the entire Branding hunt run, we will be > available on #centos-devel / irc.freenode.net as well as the > centos-devel list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ), feel free to reach out > with comments, suggestions etc. > > Also, let's build a wiki with the set of changes so we can summit them upstream for easier branding in future. Carl.