On 07/06/14 01:44, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi, > > Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking > place around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering > how best to accomodate these efforts. > > I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim. > > Thoughts ? Comments ? I think that given the difficulty that we already have in persuading people to update to 6.$latest from 6.$prehistoric that produciing even more frequent variants is not such a good idea. If the SIGs need a versioning scheme for the layers on top of the base o/s then the new naming scheme sounds good for those but the core o/s, I believe, should stick with mirroring upstream release numbers. T -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140607/e9ea4f19/attachment-0007.html>