On 8 June 2014 17:37, Bryson Lee <Bryson.Lee at sslmda.com> wrote: >> From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- >> bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider >> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 5:41 AM >> >> Yet another +1 >> >> If a change is REQUIRED, that change should happen upstream in RHEL and >> then filter down to CentOS - i.e, if RHEL-7.1406 were to be released then a >> change to CentOS-7.1406 would make sense. >> > > +1 for staying aligned with upstream. "CentOS X.Y == RHEL X.Y" is easy to explain to management and corporate IT organizations that are hostile / risk-averse to open-source. Anything that requires more words / though and you're on the defensive and have lost the battle. +1 from me. Bryson's comment, above, is very pertinent. Show me that the current system is broken and I will agree to fixing it. "Fiddling" for the sake of "fiddling" is not required; after all RHEL (and thus CentOS) is *not* Fedora. Alan.