On 06/08/2014 03:38 AM, Tim Bell wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- >> bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Wolfshant >> Sent: 08 June 2014 08:40 >> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 and release numbering >> >> On 06/07/2014 09:45 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>>> 0. CentOS-6.1011 >>>> 1. CentOS-6.1105 >>>> 2. CentOS-6.1112 >>>> 3. CentOS-6.1206 >>>> 4. CentOS-6.1302 >>>> 5. CentOS-6.1311 >>>> > My worry is that if I phone into a support line of a commercial company who is supporting CentOS (such as IBM with TSM), they will be very familiar with their baseline support level of RHEL 6.4 (since this will be in their release notes as a pre-req). If we do not have an easy way to say that the CentOS release CentOS-6.1311 is equivalent, we will create some confusion. > > Tim, All the meta data will still be there to the base version, so the above should be easy to do, Carl.