On 06/10/2014 05:32 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/10/2014 05:19 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> On 06/10/2014 05:13 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 06/10/2014 04:59 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>> On 06/10/2014 04:57 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>> On 06/10/2014 10:54 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>>>> On 06/10/2014 04:46 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>>>> On 06/10/2014 10:43 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>>>>>> So, I've got to crawl all those repos by hand to find them? >>>>>>> The only content in /rpms/ is c7, so youre going to need all of them anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> dont need to crawl, a git clone + fetch + branch and track would be >>>>>>> enough. Maybe thats what you meant by crawl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - KB >>>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure why were missing each other here. >>>>>> >>>>>> For RHEL5/RHEL6, I go to the ftp site, type 'ls' and there is a list of >>>>>> what source rpms are there. >>>>>> >>>>>> For RHEL7, How do I get the equivalent information? >>>>>> >>>>> you will need to speak with Red Hat about RHEL. >>>>> >>>> But git.centos.org is hosted at CentOS..... >>>> >>>> Do you have a name for me to contact at RH? >>>> >>>> Pat >>> We do not have any of the SRPMs either, just the git repo. We have to >>> check out the tree and assemble the SRPMs from git to build them. What >>> you see on git.centos.org is all we have too. >>> >>> >> I feel like I've already asked these questions in this thread: >> >> How do I determine which things I need to check out for building? >> How do I determine all the versions of a package in a repo - firefox has >> a Beta, RC, GA, and Errata package >> (https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!firefox.git/refs!heads!c7)? >> >> Pat > How would you determine it if that was instead a directory on an ftp > server (ie, ftp.redhat.com) and those four SRPMS where in that directory? > > How did we do it for the 6.5 release and the one main directory on > ftp.redhat.com that contained both the iso (or GA) SRPMs and the zero > day errata? > > What I plan on doing is using some kind of combination of the file lists > from the ISOs of Beta and RC .. and the release notes and the errata pages. > I'm less concerned with "this is Beta" or "this is GA" and more concerned with "this exists at all". I'm just trying to build the RHEL7 GA internally. I have a list of SRPMS I've already built. I want a list of SRPMs listed for CentOS 7 and I'll determine which ones I need to build. On ftp.redhat.com I get this information with 'ls' and a diff of my existing list. Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/