On 06/10/2014 06:33 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: > On 06/11/2014 12:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 06/10/2014 05:25 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>> On 06/10/2014 11:49 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> On 06/10/2014 10:48 PM, Connie Sieh wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 06/10/2014 10:15 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>>>>> I've seen build reports for CentOS 7 coming through. Any >>>>>>> suggestions for how I can get the 7 sources downloaded >>>>>>> with GA and errata listed out? >>>>>> all the buildreports are on buildlogs.centos.org/ but i >>>>>> believe Johnny is still working through multilib challenges >>>>>> for the bootstrap from 7rc, we've done this in the past in >>>>>> the old reimzul, but I am very keen that we do the entire >>>>>> process in the public, mock + logs etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm going to work on the errata and scl stuff in the AM >>>>>> tomorrow, will share results. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Is this version of the C7 build using "srpms" assembled from >>>>> git.centos.org or srpms from "someplace" else ? >>>> were only using git.centos.org, no 'someplace else' is >>>> available to us. >>> this means redhat has access to git.centos.org and they (you >>> don't know who) has write access and push all the source into it >>> and you don't know what they check in and you also modify the >>> same repo for centos modification??? >>> >>> it's a joke! or isn't? >>> >> We have only officially modified 3 packages ... centos-indexhtml, >> centos-release, centos-logos. All the other mods will come from >> the public branding hunt that is happening on this mailing list. >> >> The code gets put into the git repo, yes ... then we use it. >> >> Not sure what the question or joke is? > so there is host git.centos.org which is under the centos.org domain > which was created and administered by rh since you don't know who and > how create these repo. you just got it and use it. and this site > (git.centos.org) referred as the place where the src.rpm are moved > (according to ftp.redhat.com) but you don't know about it and where is > not any src.rpm at all. imho this is a bit funny. > > that's why people as where is the src.rpm and since it's under centos > domain we assume you administer this site (ie create git user and > gives rights) so we assume you know who can check in this repo who can > create this repo etc. so in stead of asking rh we can ask you to told > us how is aware of the current situation. > > so eg firefox already has 5 commits: > https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!firefox.git/refs!heads!c7 > the author can't be determined since it's always: > CentOS Sources <bugs at centos.org> from the beginning. from where can we > know which is redhat and which is centos? > > is it clean now what's the question? > > If it says CentOS Build System, then it was imported directly from the SRPM. If, on the other hand it is modified by someone, then that person will have made a change ... as in this tree: https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-core!bld-seven.git So, to answer your question. If I modify a package, the commit will have my name on it (or anyone else who modifies it) That would then mean then that the firefox tree that you linked had 4 SRPMs imported into it. There has been no mods into that branch by a person, just imports directly of the SRPMs. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140610/ff1ecf55/attachment-0007.sig>