My vote would also be to keep the version numbering in line with RHEL. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:01 PM, <Michael.Goldfinger at inhouse.wko.at> wrote: > Morning all, > > I am a real newbie. In fact I just registered to give my two cents about > the release numbering discussion. > > My vote would be to keep the version numbering in line with RHEL too. > I have always found that version numbers that increase normally are much > more logical that version numbers that include a date. > > However as someone who has not installed any Linux distributions before I > do not really care about version numbering. > I choose CentOS because I think it best matches my needs. Currently I am > waiting for CentOS 7 to start with the fresh version but > at the end it all comes down to download the latest versions from the > repositories, I do not even look at the version numbers. > It was a coincident that I found out that 7 is on the way and I decided to > wait for it. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- SZ Quadri http://sz.quadri.in -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140612/cf2cf0b8/attachment-0007.html>