On 06/17/2014 06:33 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Guillaume Derval > <guillaume.derval at student.uclouvain.be> wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >>> On 06/16/2014 01:31 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>>> >>>> Adding patches is absolutely one of the things that the plus kernel >>>> offers. In this case, as Guillaume stated, the modifications are quite >>>> extensive. Without understanding all the details of the patches, I >>>> would like to ask if there are any consequences that might >>>> "negatively" affect the existing plus kernel users. >> >> As I am not a developer of Multipath-TCP, I asked the main developer (Christoph Paasch) about that. >> Here is what he answered (translated from french): >>> I see no « negative consequences » in the inclusion of MPTCP in the centosplus kernel. >>> Everything should work normally (and if its not, it’s a bug we can fix). >>> The impact on the performance of plain TCP should be very low. > > So, we can assume adding the proposed patches should be transparent to > the plus kernel users, I suppose. Is this the case? > > KB? To go ahead with this or not? A separate specific kernel? > either way you decide, i can help facilitate it either way -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc