That remains to be seen. Openstack started in EPEL to begin with and this proved to be a bottleneck. Personally I'm happy with them maintaining it in a separate repo or SIG. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathanael D. Noblet" <nathanael at gnat.ca> To: centos-devel at centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 17 June, 2014 7:41:03 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RDO on CentOS > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rich Bowen" <rbowen at redhat.com> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Sent: Tuesday, 17 June, 2014 3:00:38 PM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] RDO on CentOS > > Hi, > > I work with the RDO project - http://openstack.redhat.com/ - where we're > trying to make OpenStack as easy as possible to deploy on CentOS, RHEL, > Fedora, et al. Since CentOS is (at least anecdotally) the leading > platform that we're seeing used with RDO, we're wondering what we can do > to make RDO easier to consume on CentOS, and, more generally, what we > can do to make OpenStack easier on CentOS. Personally when something is in EPEL or the base repo that's where I start trusting being able to install/use it. I realize that RDO likely changes a whole lot quicker than distros like RHEL/CentOS. So solving that so that you can have RDO packages in EPEL - perhaps in parallel (all in the repo but conflicting with each other or something). Would go a long way to getting people to try it I imagine. -- Nathanael _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel