On 06/17/2014 05:58 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/17/2014 06:24 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky at fnal.gov> >> >> I realized the scripts I've been sending in weren't licensed. >> >> So, I've added one to show_possible_srpms.sh. >> >> Perhaps we should talk about getting the rest of the tools >> under an open source license. >> >> Pat Riehecky (1): >> Realized this was missing a license, added >> > any specific reason to go with GPLv3 ? > > Not really, just seemed like a workable choice for a pile of scripts. Pat -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/