On 06/18/2014 11:30 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/18/2014 03:56 PM, Florian La Roche wrote: >> Hello Karanbir Singh, >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Yup, its that question again : do we want to leave, but >>> patch-to-non-functional the rhn and subscription-manager tools in the >>> distro. I know its useful to some projects to leave in, but do they care ? >> >> Even epel-release depends on rhn files for CentOS7 at the moment: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093918 > what does the rhn/sources file contain ? can we mock/stub that from > centos-release ? ( is there a need to.. ) > > There's also the issue of the rhn integration into libreport/abrt (RPM: libreport-plugin-rhtsupport). Whatever solution goes here should probably be applied to that pkg as well - it's a very similar situation. Simply dropping it means modifying the dependencies in a bunch of packages which try to include it, whereas the option is modifying to remove branding - which seems useless because there is just no point. -- Thanks, David Mansfield Cobite, INC.