On 06/20/2014 02:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/20/2014 12:27 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> On 06/20/2014 02:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> On 06/20/2014 12:20 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>>> My point exactly. The SIGs (who will introduce new stuff anyway ) can >>>> derive the name as they please . The core should stay as it was. >>> Alternative media for the distro - like cloud images etc are all coming >>> from and a part of the Core distro, its not SIG specific. >> even though, one can label the isos and the image as one please. for >> instance freepbx ships >> "Stable-5.211.65-14 " which is based on centos 6.5 ( hence the 65 in the >> name ) , freepbx 2.11 ( hence 211 in the name ) and so on > sure, the SIG's can number and release in a way that makes the most > sense for them, but in this case were talking about the Core Distro > itself. And what I and other preach is that the current naming scheme is just fine and there is no visible benefit in the proposed change