On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: > On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>> On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 >>>>>> centos repos available? currently many i686 packages >>>>>> missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these >>>>>> packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards. >>>>>> >>>>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have >>>>> everything required to build everything in the current c7 >>>>> tree .. we'll get that pushed soon >>>> OK, Its there (c7.00.02) >>> may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 >>> package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by >>> everything... >>> >> I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working >> fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we >> keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right >> one. >> >> To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, >> it can pick either one to use. > can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? > unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by > rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so > with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to > build any i686 rpm:-( > I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140621/cac59d78/attachment-0007.sig>