On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 04:48:22PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: <huge snip> > > So, we have never been binary (byte for byte) compatible ... instead we > wanted to be and checked for the things in the tmverifyrpms script above. > > We just want to make sure we say what we are trying to do ... and the > same file lists, linking the same libraries, within 10% of the size is > it. So thats what we want and that is "functionally" but not "byte for > byte" compatible. I always figured that what you MEANT by binary compatible, is "they work the same, don't break linkage with SOs, and when you run it you won't observe any difference" other than branding. -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." ----------------------------- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -----------------------------