On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 06/23/2014 10:38 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> The GPL requires that anyone who receives sources has the right to >> redistribute them freely, although Red Hat seems to think they can >> restrict this right if they do it by tying the restriction to the >> support contract. > > It is a matter of opinion as to whether Red Hat's exercise of their > right to terminate a subscription constitutes a 'restriction' on the > right to redistribute source. If an unpleasant consequence for doing something included in a contract isn't a restriction, what would a restriction? Does it have to include death threats to make it real? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com