On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 06/12/2014 02:31 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> However, kernel-plus is also fine with me. Since this is KB's choice, >> if no one is against it, I suppose this is going to be the "final >> answer". > > go go go ! where is my plus kernel ? I have it -- well protected from prying eyes. :) I have another question. Now that the "plus" is in the name, should we drop the ".plus" tag? For example, the current plus kernel is in the form of: kernel-xxx.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 This will become: kernel-plus-xxx.el7.centos.x86_64 One argument against omitting the .plus tag may become apparent here: $ uname -r 3.10.0-123.el7.centos.x86_64 If/when there is, say, kernel-xen for c7, that will share the same 'uname' output as the plus kernel. Thoughts? Akemi