On 06/24/2014 07:18 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> On 06/23/2014 02:48 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> I have another question. Now that the "plus" is in the name, should we >>> drop the ".plus" tag? For example, the current plus kernel is in the >>> form of: >>> >>> kernel-xxx.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 >>> >>> This will become: >>> >>> kernel-plus-xxx.el7.centos.x86_64 >>> >>> One argument against omitting the .plus tag may become apparent here: >>> >>> $ uname -r >>> 3.10.0-123.el7.centos.x86_64 >>> >>> If/when there is, say, kernel-xen for c7, that will share the same >>> 'uname' output as the plus kernel. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> That is a sticky one .. I supposed one could argue that the .plus does >> not need to be there since it is in the name, but more important than >> `uname -r` specifically is what is in /lib/modules/ for the directory >> structure. If the kernel-xen and the kernel-plus are also trying to use >> the same structure there, then that will obviously not work, so we will >> need something unique in that part of the string. > Exactly. So, > > kernel-plus-xxx.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 > > should be used? > I think so then, yes ... OR, we need to modify the package to add the plus there. It used to do that for c5 (at least) kernels with a processing script somewhere (so kernel-xen got a xen appended to the modules location ) .. not exactly sure where that is right now and if we want to do that or use the .plus instead. But when we do xen and that other kernel we were taking about, the issue will come up again. >> Note: you will have to roll in KB's certificate changes (now in >> git.centos.org) and we will have to build it on the server that can sign >> the secureboot stuff before we release it ... the >> 3154598aff24615c1f82d79ed299fb3d155d3282 revision is the GA kernel with >> the new certs and brandig mods. >> f355f5c33a16a2168bdad17ccc60db6b8198f6af is the revision for the ZeroDay >> update with the certs and mods. > I'm doing a test build of the GA kernel with the centos certificate > added (almost done). Once I know it boots and works, I will submit it > your way so that it is built on your server. Then further testing has > to be done for secureboot and others. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140624/343a104d/attachment-0007.sig>