On 06/26/2014 07:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote: > Hi, > > Do you publish somewhere those packages, which are built for multilib > purposes but are not in the RHEL packagelist? I'd like to use them for > bootstrapping the EL7 i686 builds and see, what happens. I don't like > to use Fedora 19 packages for bootstrapping, since I'd have to do the > compilation twice. > > I'd like to help building the i686 packages, where should I start? > Yes, they are all in c7.00.0[2,3,4] and c7-updates: http://buildlogs.centos.org/ You could likely use lftp mirror command to get those, though it will take a while. Once CentOS-7 GA is out the door, we will likely start concentrating on this ... it should be something that is a priority soon after. But, I would expect both EL 5.11 and EL 6.6 fairly soon as well, so we will have to see what happens. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *Feladó: *"Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> > *Címzett: *centos-devel at centos.org > *Elküldött üzenetek: *Csütörtök, 2014. Június 26. 14:05:22 > *Tárgy: *Re: [CentOS-devel] missing packages from buildlogs repo > > On 06/26/2014 06:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I > tried to > > use the i686 packages here: > > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/ > > > > The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing. > (that's > > ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support) > > > > The interesting part is that there is the source package *cracklib*, > > which produces the following packages: > > cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python. > > > > Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the > other two > > packages are missing. How can it be? > > Did I miss some information about populating the repo? > > The multilib packages contained in CentOS-7 x86_64 distro are the same > as those contained in the upstream EL7 version, as we purposely match > the filelists. > > As KB stated, all the i686 packages we needed to do the build are > in the > c7.00.0? (or c7-updates) directories. But even those are not > enough for > a full tree ... just want we needed to get all the i686 for multilib. > > We are planning on building a full i686 ARCH, as I have said before. > But the x86_64 manifest will not have all the i686 packages, only the > multilib ones. > > So eventually, all the i686 RPMs will be available when we actually > build to complete an i686 tree. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140626/762932c6/attachment-0007.sig>