Why not include Fail2Ban in the extras too. It is a nice utility to have. john plemons On 6/26/2014 10:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/26/2014 06:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> EL7 Extras contain docker and the things to make it work, including >> several golang-* RPMs. >> >> It seems that the golang addon packages >> (golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.4.git9d69345.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-github-godbus-dbus-0-0.1.gitcb98efb.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-github-gorilla-context-0-0.22.git708054d.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-github-gorilla-mux-0-0.11.gite718e93.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.19.git98c7b80.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-github-syndtr-gocapability-0-0.5.git3454319.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-googlecode-net-0-0.12.hg84a4013f96e0.el7.src.rpm, >> golang-googlecode-sqlite-0-0.9.hg74691fb6f837.el7.src.rpm) were built >> before the final golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm that is in git.centos.org. >> >> We have seen in the past where Red Hat uses interim staged packages that >> are older (and not published) in their build systems for development, >> and that the released SRPMs build on those older staged packages but not >> the released ones. As I said, we have seen this in the past and it was >> one of the main reasons that we could not get all of CentOS-6.0 to build >> properly before. >> >> So, how this is relevant now is that several of those addon golang >> packages (and docker) do not build with the RPMs provided by building >> golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm. After talking with the golang maintainer >> and some people who worked on the golang and docker packages via email, >> while I could not look inside the build trees (we don't have access to >> any of that for RHEL products), I did get conformation that the packages >> in EL7 extras were built on older versions of golang that 1.2.1-3 and >> that golang-1.2.1-3 is in the middle of a process to transition things >> to a new set of packages instead of most things directly in the one main >> RPM. >> >> I was also pointed to golang.el7 rpms here as potential versions that >> would work: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16224 >> >> The greatest specific version of golang required to build the packages >> of EL7 Extras (docker-0.11.1-19.el7.src.rpm) is golang >= 1.2-7 (see the >> spec file for the golang BuildRequires): >> >> https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!docker.git/b28b51e15aa6779281060b1e61368d948730d0f4/SPECS!docker.spec >> >> So, looking for golang-1.2-7.el7 put me here: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=499629 >> >> I downloaded that SRPM (golang-1.2-7.el7.src.rpm) and built it into >> c7-extras instead of the 1.2.1-3 version and then rebuilt all the other >> golang-* SRPMs from git.centos.org into c7-extras as well. They all >> built OK against golang 1.2-7. I then built all the other things that >> are in EL7 Extras into c7-extras and the final result is here: >> >> http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/ >> >> Here is a bug filed on this issue for reference: >> >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7252 >> >> So, the short summary is, please test the c7-extras in the buildlogs >> repo ... it has the same version of packages built from git.centos.org >> except for golang, where I had to get version 1.2-7 from EPEL. All the >> SRPMs, buildlogs, mock configs, etc used are available for review from >> the buildlogs.centos.org link above. >> >> Lets get this tested and it is certainly considered a test build. >> Hopefully newer versions of everything will be out soon so we can build >> / use the RHEL version of golang and we are likely not to officially >> release these packages until then, although if these packages work for >> you feel free to use them. > Now that we have this docker version built, we know that it has an issue > with looking for a Red Hat entitlement. We are currently working on > taking that out so it can run docker images on CentOS without that. > Will post here when that is working. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140626/2854dc26/attachment-0007.html>