On 26 June 2014 10:22, Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Stephen, thanks for sharing! In my opinion I'd say "minimal" doesn't > need things like: mailx, nfs-utils, patch, rsync, screen, telnet, > traceroute, strace, tmux. vim-enhanced I personally would like to include, > but it's not really minimal. > > Aha. tmux is for the rest of the admins, screen must be for me. I need to go learn tmux I guess. Ok lets cut this down again for a micro %packages --nobase --excludedocs acpid authconfig bind-utils biosdevname busybox crontabs dhclient iptables-services -iwl* -libertas* -logwatch mailx ntp ntpdate openssh-clients openssh-server postfix -prelink rsync telnet traceroute strace vim-enhanced yum yum-utils %end The reason for rsync is it needs to be on the client if you want to rsync stuff to it. I usually find that is the first thing I have to install on any box on the internet. I mean really micro could boil down to %packages --nobase --excludedocs %end > Just throwing that out there for discussion. I don't have a strong > disagreement with your list -- although 888M does seem to be getting kind > of large. I wonder what size Wolfy has stuff down to? :) > > No problem I figured it was a working example of a less than @core set of packages. > -Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140626/789e5fa2/attachment-0007.html>