[CentOS-devel] NX : centos-extras versus EPEL
Akemi Yagi
amyagi at gmail.comSat Mar 1 19:10:20 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] scons not available on CentOS 6 i386 repos
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] NX : centos-extras versus EPEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I know a number of people have been using the nx/freenx packages available from the centos-extras repo. Now, EPEL recently started distributing NX packages. When you run 'yum update' with epel enabled, it will replace CentOS' nx as seen here: http://pastebin.centos.org/8101/ Have any of you tried EPEL's version? If so, can you share your findings? The open-source edition of NX (version 3.5.x) is virtually static because there would not be updates from NoMachine. I don't know if EPEL made any changes/additions to what CentOS offers. Akemi
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] scons not available on CentOS 6 i386 repos
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] NX : centos-extras versus EPEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list